After the race Carl Edwards commented on the move saying, “A real smart racer explained it to me this way after he wrecked me and I was really mad. He said, ‘I just had to look at your rear bumper and decide, would you do this to me? And you had before, so it was a real simple decision.’”

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

For many that’s known as The Golden Rule. Not only is it supposed to guide society, but when individuals keep the so-called Golden Rule in mind, we suddenly find ourselves living in a society where morality is high, and kindness reigns supreme. Very early in life we’re taught to respect one another, and above all, keep in mind, that if we don’t want to be treated badly, then we should not treat others badly. Does this mean we’re never treated poorly, or that we never treat others poorly? Probably not. After all, lets also remember that we’re human. That means along the way we’re bound to step on some toes. Whether it’s done intentionally, or unintentionally, things happen and we do stupid things.

But, in the end, we need to ask ourselves, have we learned from the experience?

Kyle Busch of course was not happy after the race. But then again, he never is and will always cry foul when he gets treated poorly. But reality is this, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” Or, put another way, “What goes around, comes around.” That’s exactly what happened in the race. During the post race interview Edwards went onto say;

“Earlier this year we had a Nationwide race and Kyle was a lot faster than me and he went ahead and got to my back bumper of my car and sent me up the racetrack. Afterwards, he said, ‘sorry man, my car was just faster.’ So in my mind, I had to ask myself when I went down there in the corner, ‘Should I lift and brake early and do the best I can or should I just kind of give him a little tap and see what happens.’ So that’s the way it went and that’s the decision I made and I’d do it again.”

If Busch is going to blame anyone for the on-track incident, he needs to blame himself. He’s set the stage and his own table for how he’s treated on the race track. What goes around comes around, and it came around to him last night. How did Busch react? Very poorly. After the checkered flag flew, Busch pulled up along side of Edwards and rammed his car into the 99 car.

First off, this is just wrong. I’ve written about such actions before, and no matter who it is, I’ve always said if someone decides to use their car as a weapon, they should be parked by NASCAR. Since Busch used his car as a weapon, he needs to be parked by NASCAR. If those who sanction NASCAR are going to get the drivers attention for such behavior on the track, they need to park them for a race or two. Will that happen? Probably not. After all, Busch is first in points, and right now he seems to be the golden boy of NASCAR who can do no wrong. That should have no bearing on their decision at all though. I’ve said this about all the drivers, Carl Edwards included when he’s pulled such on track stunts. The bottom line is this, if a driver uses his car as a weapon, he should be parked and miss a few races.

How did NASCAR view the whole situation? They were obviously upset with Busch, but not Edwards. When the race was finished, Kyle Busch was called to the NASCAR hauler, the equivalent of the Principal’s office, for a talking to. Edwards however was not called in. What was said during the behind closed door meeting is unknown. Busch did not comment when he came out of the hauler. But, if NASCAR were smart, they looked Busch in the eye and said, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” In the past Busch has proven he has no problem putting someone into the wall while going for win. Simply put, Edwards, and pretty much every other driver on the track, did to Busch what he does to them.

Am I condoning the actions of Edwards on the track? Absolutely not. Personally, I do not like it when drivers, any driver, pushes someone else out of the way. If you can’t race clean, don’t race at all. But we can all learn a lesson from the on track antics at last nights race. It should make us all pause for a moment and ask, “How do I treat others? Do I treat them as I would like to be treated?” Or, and maybe this is even better, maybe we should ask, “Am I being treated poorly because I’ve treated the other person poorly?” If the answer to that question is yes, then maybe it’s time to make some personal changes along the way.

Will change come easy? Probably not. After all, in many cases it’s a mindset change we need to tap in to as we journey along this thing we call life. But, the Golden Rule has been around for a long time. When we act responsibly toward others, usually they act responsibly toward us.

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”
Luke 6:31

A Fellow Sojourner,
Dr. Rus

Where’s the beef!?

The slogan was introduced in the 1980′s when Wendy’s introduced a commercial called “Fluffy Bun” with Clara Peller declaring — Where’s the beef? — Now the ever popular catch phrase has become somewhat of an all-purpose phrase questioning the substance, or lack thereof, of almost anything we can think of.

Many today are looking for some kind of meaning in life. In survey after survey, when people are asked – If you could ask God, or a Supreme Being, one question, what would that question be? – Most respond by saying, “What is my purpose and destiny in life.” In other words, people seem to be looking for the beef in life. Some say there has to be more, while others are simply looking for meaning, purpose and destiny.

A recent Rasmussen poll reveals some interesting results when it comes to the nation’s belief in God, or a Supreme Being. The results showed;

• 78% believe in God
• 15% believe in a Higher Power
• 7% believe in nothing

In other words, according to the Rasmussen poll, 93% of the population in the United States, believe in some kind of Supreme Being. Wow! That’s amazing! If this is true I find myself asking a few questions;

• Why are churches not full to overflowing?
• Why do atheists tell us their numbers are on the rise?
• Where are the believers who don’t show up for church every week?
• Has the church somehow dropped the ball on attracting those who have some kind of spiritual awareness?

Somewhere along the line those inside the church have shut out those outside the church who, according to the recent poll, do have some kind of a God awareness. Could it be that a large portion of the population who say they believe in God, or at least have some kind of a God awareness, don’t feel welcome in church? If the Rasmussen poll numbers are correct, that would certainly seem to be the case.

I guess the next question could be something like — Is this a bad thing? Is it a bad thing to have a large number of those who say they have a God awareness outside the church? That all depends on what they’re doing. In the early days of the church, the disciples spent more time outside the church, than inside the church. It’s more of a North American culture mindset which says the only way to connect with God is inside a church. Reality is, we’re supposed to be transforming the environment we’re involved in each day. While the early disciples met for daily prayer times at the temple, they were more involved in the lives of those around them on an everyday basis.

So, I ask again, is the Rasmussen poll wrong?

If we’re measuring church attendance as a factor in arriving at the number of 93% of the population having some kind of a God awareness, we have to say the poll is wrong. Why? Because it’s obvious 93% of the population are not attending church. If they were, every church in the nation would be full to overflowing. Many inside the church may lament such a poll and wonder where the people are. But maybe a better approach is to discover ways to help all of those outside the church, but with a belief in God, figure out how to mainstream their message of hope, purpose and destiny so the world might truly be transformed.

A Fellow Sojourner,
Dr. Rus

With that in mind, I thought I’d try this again, and maybe along the way, encourage a few others in this journey we call life.

Tonight I’ve been pondering the word relationships. So often the concept of relationship and networking revolves around not encouraging one another, but how can we use one another. What an outdated concept of networking and relationship. I believe true networking and relationship occurs when we come together to encourage one another, and help one another along in life.

A Fellow Sojourner,
Dr. Rus